Australian engineering-led knowledgeEvidence · Context · Application

Technical case record · Metals recovery

Iron recovery and concrete additives

A laboratory sequence recovered iron, then used the remaining silica-rich material in concrete admixtures.

Qidashan, Anshan, ChinaLaboratory study · 2019

Research by Tang and colleagues (2019)

All authors & citation

Chang Tang; Keqing Li; Wen Ni; Duncheng Fan (2019). Recovering Iron from Iron Ore Tailings and Preparing Concrete Composite Admixtures. DOI: 10.3390/min9040232

CC BY 4.0 · Original research credit belongs to the authors. Summary by Waste2Resource.

Results

The iron product contained 92.30 wt% iron. Recovery was 93.96% from the pre-concentrate, equivalent to 78.79% from the original tailings. Mortar containing the 20% residue/80% slag admixture reached 33.11 MPa at seven days and 50 MPa at 28 days.

§§3.2.7 and 3.3.3 ↗

How it was tested

Qidashan tailings were pre-concentrated magnetically. The selected roast used 1,250°C for 50 minutes and a pre-concentrate:coal:lime:sodium-carbonate ratio of 100:17.5:12.5:7.5. Silica-rich residue from pre-concentration was ground with slag for 30 minutes and tested in mortar. The mortar used 225 g cement, 225 g composite admixture, 1,350 g sand and 225 g water: the admixture replaced half of the cement by mass.

§2.2; §§3.2.7–3.3; Tables 8–9 ↗

Study limits

The authors state that the combined effects of sodium carbonate, lime and other factors on iron recovery were not investigated. The reported settings came from single-factor tests.

§3.2.7, p. 9 ↗

Authors’ recommendations

The authors favour 20% residue for admixture performance, while suggesting 30% may suit greater residue use. They say strength and flow should be considered together when choosing the proportion.

§§3.3.2–3.3.3 ↗

Original sources

Chang Tang; Keqing Li; Wen Ni; Duncheng Fan (2019). Recovering Iron from Iron Ore Tailings and Preparing Concrete Composite Admixtures.

← Back to library