Australian engineering-led knowledgeEvidence · Context · Application

Research landscape

Research

A source-linked view of what has been tested, what the authors’ results support, and what still requires site-specific or field validation. These summaries are evidence signposts—not product approvals or universal recipes.

Peer-reviewed sourcesTests and findingsReadiness and next questions

A growing evidence base

Not one paper, one product or one answer.

Tailings reuse spans mineral characterisation, separation and reprocessing, ceramics, concrete, geopolymers, environmental performance and closure planning.

Each paper answers a different part of the engineering question: what is in the residue, what can it become, what has been demonstrated, and what remains before deployment?

Research evidence ledger

What has actually been tested?

Tailings / ceramics

Plombières facing bricks

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022 ↗
Tests reported

Material characterisation; blend modification; product quality and environmental assessment; cradle-to-gate lifecycle assessment.

What the paper supports

Untreated tailings performed satisfactorily in the assessed facing-brick blends. The study reports improved environmental performance at 40 wt% tailings.

ReadinessLab feasibility demonstrated

Next: plant-specific blend and production QA.

Gold tailings / concrete

Southern Ecuador blocks

Sustainability, 2022 ↗
Tests reported

Physical, chemical and mineralogical characterisation; EN 12457-2 leaching; sand replacement; strength and absorption.

What the paper supports

The tested tailings were feasible as a sand substitute under the reported test conditions and did not produce toxic leachates in the study.

ReadinessConditional / site-specific

Next: local standards, durability and pilot manufacturing.

Gold tailings / masonry

Pamaka cement-tailings bricks

Cleaner Waste Systems, 2025 ↗
Tests reported

Gold and mercury assessment; mix-ratio trials; compressive strength and water absorption.

What the paper supports

The tested units met the stated criteria for non-loadbearing masonry, with reported compressive strength of 5.02–13.3 MPa.

ReadinessConditional / site-specific

Next: durability, QA and production-scale validation.

Iron tailings / geopolymer

Western Australian bricks

IJMRE, 2016 ↗
Tests reported

XRD; curing and activator optimisation; compressive strength; water absorption; durability; cost analysis.

What the paper supports

Under the investigated conditions, geopolymer bricks achieved strength up to 50.53 MPa and met cited brick requirements.

ReadinessLab feasibility demonstrated

Next: reagent handling, long-term exposure and plant economics.

Construction / evidence gaps

Western Australian review

MRIWA, 2025 ↗
Evidence reviewed

Peer-reviewed literature and cases on iron-ore and gold tailings in construction materials and Australian standards.

What it adds

Fine-aggregate substitution is promising, while variability, durability, leaching and practical scale-up determine transferability.

ReadinessFurther research required

Use as a checklist for pilot design.